- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:00:28 +0200
- To: "Andrey Mikhalev" <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
- Cc: "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:02:36 +0200, Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru> wrote: > neither: > ability to aceess @namespace rules essential if stylesheet > constructed using cssom api. Do implementations even support this? Changing the representation in the object model does not have to effect whether it can be created and/or serialized though. > removing them from rules collection making cssom inconsistent/inadequate. > the same if changes not affect namespace map (subsequent rule insertion > broken). I don't follow. > too high price for 'perfect serialization'. i prefer non-serializable > impl: > - changes in @namespace rules mirrored to namespace map in sheet's > context immediately; > - such map used only during parse; > - any subsequent parser invocation use current state of map. This seems a lot worse. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 20:05:11 UTC