Re: [Selectors] Clarify when universal selector may be omitted

Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> fantasai On 09-10-20 04.20:
>> Please let me know if this addresses your comments.
> Nits: you wrote "an an" instead of "an" (first sentence).

Fixed. Thanks.

> Proposal/Comment
> In short, I suggest that the last sentence should start like this (my 
> changes in UPPERCASE):
>    <p>If a universal selector represented by THE <code>*</code> ONLY 
> (THAT IS: without a namespace prefix) is not immediately followed by a 
> pseudo-element AND ALSO IS NOT the only component IN a sequence of 
> simple selectors, then [ ... etc]
> Background/Explanations
> ...

I've inserted "i.e." inside the parentheses. I decline to make the other
changes, as I feel the sentence is adequately clear as-is and I don't
find the proposed change to be a noticeable improvement, if any.


Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:42:20 UTC