- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:55:04 -0700
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Anton Prowse wrote: > Congratulations on a very solid-looking specification! > > Here are the things that I noticed when reading through the document. > (Trivial editorial issues are listed separately at the end.) > ... > 6.6.4. The UI element states pseudo-classes > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#UIstates) : > > # Most elements will be neither :enabled nor :disabled. > > Issue 3: This sentence is meaningless for general document languages. It's meant to clarify that e.g. paragraph text does not match either :enabled or :disabled. Adjusted to # In a typical document most elements will be neither :enabled nor # :disabled." but I don't think we should remove it. Please let me know if this is acceptable. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 18:55:41 UTC