Re: [css3-selectors] LC issues #3

Anton Prowse wrote:
> Congratulations on a very solid-looking specification!
> 
> Here are the things that I noticed when reading through the document.
> (Trivial editorial issues are listed separately at the end.)
> ...
> 6.6.4. The UI element states pseudo-classes
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#UIstates) :
> 
>   # Most elements will be neither :enabled nor :disabled.
> 
> Issue 3:  This sentence is meaningless for general document languages.

It's meant to clarify that e.g. paragraph text does not match either
:enabled or :disabled. Adjusted to

  # In a typical document most elements will be neither :enabled nor
  # :disabled."

but I don't think we should remove it.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

~fantasai