Re: [css3-selectors] LC issues #3

Anton Prowse wrote:
> Congratulations on a very solid-looking specification!
> Here are the things that I noticed when reading through the document.
> (Trivial editorial issues are listed separately at the end.)
> ...
> 6.6.4. The UI element states pseudo-classes
> ( :
>   # Most elements will be neither :enabled nor :disabled.
> Issue 3:  This sentence is meaningless for general document languages.

It's meant to clarify that e.g. paragraph text does not match either
:enabled or :disabled. Adjusted to

  # In a typical document most elements will be neither :enabled nor
  # :disabled."

but I don't think we should remove it.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.


Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 18:55:41 UTC