- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:52:43 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:36:39 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > I propose the following text to replace the first paragraph in section > 16.3.1 of CSS 2.1: > > Inline elements cause all of the boxes they generate to be affected by > any text-decoration specified on the element or propagated from a > non-inline parent, and further propagate these text-decorations to any > in-flow children that are not inline-table or inline-block. All other > elements propagate text-decorations to their in-flow children. > Non-inline elements with inline children are considered to have an > anonymous inline box that wraps any inline content. There seems to be some mixing up of elements and boxes here. It's not completely clear to me if the parent/child relationships described are supposed to refer to the document tree or the formatting structure. Also, what's an inline element (/"non-inline parent"/"non-inline element"/"inline child") exactly? The term seems to be used elsewhere too, but I only see definitions (if they can be called that) for "inline-level element" and "inline box". -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 15:53:40 UTC