- From: Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:54:48 +0300 (MSK)
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > The "wouldn't reach up" is correct. That is, the ancestor draws the > decorations no matter what. The child can draw its own decorations, but > can't make the ancestor's go away. inadequate model. child should draws all decorations, since "Relatively positioning a descendant moves all text decorations affecting it". so, if i have invisible relative child, it will paint decorations propagated from parent? weird... > > -Boris > > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:55:35 UTC