On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > (I think it'll end up reading sort of weird, though - the intrinsic > dimensions of the gradient are the same as the effective dimensions of > an image without intrinsic dimensions used in the same context.) Does it seem sensical to refer to this as the 'painting area' as an intuitive hook, and then go into detail about what that means (basically what I wrote above)? ~TJReceived on Monday, 9 November 2009 14:59:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:40 UTC