- From: Ryan Seddon <seddon.ryan@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:41:18 +1100
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 03:45:27 UTC
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm finally happy with my radial-gradient() syntax. You can view it >> at http://www.xanthir.com/:4bhipd (scroll down past the >> linear-gradient() examples). >> > > We landed an implementation of this spec on Firefox trunk today --- with a > -moz prefix, of course --- so it'll be in the latest nightly build by now. > We think it's pretty complete. So people who want to experiment with this in > a browser can now do so. Feedback appreciated. > Why was linear-gradient, radial-gradient decided? To me it would make more sense to have the syntax as gradient-linear, gradient-radial, gradient-repeating-radial etc. They're all gradients and would make more sense, especially if scanning a CSS document you could determine a lot quicker that those styles are all gradients. -Ryan
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 03:45:27 UTC