- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:24:27 -0800
- To: "Giovanni Campagna" <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:37:49 -0800, Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/11/3 fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>: >> The specs currently say that the UA is "not required to" match against >> default attribute values. It's unclear whether the UA "may" match >> against them or is "required not to" match against them. > > I'd like it to say that the UA is "required to match against the > current attribute value, which may include default attribute values if > the source document has been modified by other means (DTD, XMLSchema, > knowledge of the namespace)" > This is similar to *may*, but the dependence is not on the UA > implementing CSS differently, instead is on the choice between > non-validating and validating processing and infoset (DOM / ESIS) > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/selector.html#default-attrs >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#def-values I don't think we have to say anything about this at all. Selectors match against the resulting tree. What the resulting tree looks like is not up to Selectors. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2009 15:25:13 UTC