- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:05:10 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mar 30, 2009, at 5:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:50 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >>> Sorry but border is not an outline either. E.g. outline does not >>> participate in hits testing. But border does. How you border image >>> solution will handle :hover state? >> >> Those are good questions. I suppose for simplicity anything outside >> the >> border-box would not participate in hit testing or hover testing. > > This would also be a very good argument for still combining > border-radius with border-image; border-radius will clip the hit box, > which can be useful to match up with some border-image shapes. For hit-testing, yes. For clipping, no. If I have to chose between hit-testing and not having my image clipped by the radius, then I prefer the latter. Consider an images like these: http://www.bradclicks.com/cssplay/border-image/borders.png In each case, it would be useful to have border-radius for fallback, for background-clipping, and for hit/hover-testing, but not for clipping the border-image.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 15:05:55 UTC