RE: [css3-selectors] minor question about :not()

> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> 
> >
> > So let me explain : according to section 4, a pseudo-element is not a
> > simple selector. It's then impossible to negate a pseudo-element.
> 
> well, then section 4 is wrong, since not allow alone pseudo-element
> as selector.

Would you mind quoting all the relevant statements demonstrating the contradiction ?

Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 22:59:20 UTC