- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:58:38 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > > > > So let me explain : according to section 4, a pseudo-element is not a > > simple selector. It's then impossible to negate a pseudo-element. > > well, then section 4 is wrong, since not allow alone pseudo-element > as selector. Would you mind quoting all the relevant statements demonstrating the contradiction ?
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 22:59:20 UTC