- From: Oscar Godson <oscargodson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:06:01 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <94a94d770903020255g85c4d71q49fbef6a42c6e288@mail.gmail.com>
I'm not sure if I even understand this or how this got put into the specs of CSS. Animations are not styles in any way. I feel like this is going to be like <b>,<i>,<font> tags in HTML where years later we are trying to correct the issue with separating the presentation from the structure of the page. Why wouldn't there be an animation language we could place in a <link/> tag and have the browser render all animations in language made for animations. Can't we put effort and time into getting support for valid web page styles like shadows, columns, gradients, border styles, multiple backgrounds etc rather than trying to go completely outside the scope of CSS. We can't even have real columns or rounded corners but we want to be able to dynamically change properties of the current partially browser supported properties? As of now we dynamically manipulate CSS with JavaScript to have the _appearance of animations_, but shouldn't we just have a language that _actually animates_ the DOM?
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 15:02:19 UTC