- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:13:14 -0500
- To: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org
On Jun 29, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > 2009/6/29 David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>: >> On Jun 28, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:44 AM, L. David Baron >> <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: >>> >>> I have another question about transitions that I think ought to be >>> addressed in the spec ( http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/ ), >>> though in this case I'm not exactly sure how it should be addressed >>> in the spec. >>> >>> This is the question of whether transition should be associated with >>> a change in style on a content node, or a change in style on a >>> rendering object (a box). Either solution poses a bunch of >>> problems. >>> >>> If transitions are associated with the style on an element (DOM >>> node), then we have problems in any case where a content node has >>> more than one style. The main case of this I can think of is >>> pseudo-elements. For example, I think it's hard to do something >>> sensible with: >>> p { color: gray; } >>> p::first-line { color: black; } >>> p:hover { color: blue; } >>> p:hover::first-line { color: aqua; } >>> a { transition: 3s color; } >>> then it's really not clear what the transition on the anchor should >>> be when the p goes into the :hover state (either when the anchor is >>> split between the first line and the second, or when the anchor is >>> entirely in the first line). >> >> How about: if an element has a first-line or first-letter rule >> setting a >> property on it, then transitions on that property are disabled for >> the >> element and all its descendants. >> >> I'm not understanding why transitions can't be made to work on >> first-line >> and first-letter? >> dave >> (hyatt@apple.com) >> > > Because in that case you would have two starting values and two ending > values, one for the part of element that inherits from ::first-line, > the other from the part of element that inherits from the element > directly, whereas transitions expect one. Sure, but I don't see why that is a problem, as long as you specify what happens. dave (hyatt@apple.com)
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 15:14:05 UTC