- From: Jorrit Vermeiren <mercator+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:26:02 +0200
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 19:24, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > It seems the WG was split between B & C, but A or C seem most reasonable to me (and I favor C). [...] > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 11:47 PM, fantasai wrote: > > <fantasai> A) Keep the middle by default. Add 'empty' to clip it. > <fantasai> B) Clip the middle by default. Add 'fill' to use it. > <fantasai> C) No keyword, always kept. (Make transparent as needed.) > > [...] > > RESOLVED: Clip middle by default, add 'fill' to use it I agree with Brad as well. Having just read his (excellent) proposal [1], which is being used in the current draft [2], I'm a little puzzled by the choice for B. Apart from the reasons he already mentioned, that proposal removes the necessary 1-to-1 relationship between the padding-box and the middle image. I'm pretty sure that for most cases where the padding-box and middle image don't match up, the default of clipping the middle is going to be nonsensical, unless it's transparent or matches the background anyway. Option A feels like little more than a fallback for JPEG borders which need the transparency. Furthermore, that usage would probably be limited to cases where the middle image does match the padding-box. Other than that, it is mostly harmless and sounds like a reasonable compromise between B and C. Jorrit [1] http://www.bradclicks.com/cssplay/border-image/Thinking_Outside_The_Box.html [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#border-images P.S. alternatives to 'empty': clip, clear, blank, edges-only, no-center? (P.P.S. Sorry Brad, I forgot to include www-style.)
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 21:26:39 UTC