- From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:59:23 +0100
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
2009/6/23 Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>: >>> I’d say “DRM” is not something I’m a particular fan of - proper expression >>> of licensing intent, and the unlocking of commercially-produced font >>> licenses for use with web content, IS. >> >>Are you saying that IE would implement a non-DRM web font format? > > I don't speak for IE. Do you personally think IE would implement a non-DRM web font format? >From what I have heard from Microsoft representatives, I don't. > I should be clearer, though - I think full expression of "your > digital rights" in a web font format is a good idea (in fact, I think it's a > necessity, and that's where .ttf/.otf falls down) What do you personally think about Tom Lord's proposal? > TTF/OTF on the web is akin to saying you have to put the > bits to Photoshop up on the web in order for anyone to > view images created with it. But trying to make read-only fonts is like make water not wet?
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 08:00:14 UTC