Re: New work on fonts at W3C

Brad Kemper wrote:
> I'm referring to Open Type and True Type, which do not seem to have the
> same sort of patent complications as EOT.

You mean, except

http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=B58bAAAAEBAJ (Apple)
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=rTEhAAAAEBAJ (Apple)
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=lk4hAAAAEBAJ (Apple)
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=szcIAAAAEBAJ (Microsoft)

which all apply to the OpenType font format and its ISO/IEC version, the
ISO/IEC 14496-22 Open Font Format?

A.

-- 

Adam Twardoch
| Language Typography Unicode Fonts OpenType
| twardoch.com | silesian.com | fontlab.net

The illegal we do immediately.
The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
(Henry Kissinger)

Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 17:20:38 UTC