- From: Adam Twardoch <list.adam@twardoch.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:19:54 +0200
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
Brad Kemper wrote: > I'm referring to Open Type and True Type, which do not seem to have the > same sort of patent complications as EOT. You mean, except http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=B58bAAAAEBAJ (Apple) http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=rTEhAAAAEBAJ (Apple) http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=lk4hAAAAEBAJ (Apple) http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=szcIAAAAEBAJ (Microsoft) which all apply to the OpenType font format and its ISO/IEC version, the ISO/IEC 14496-22 Open Font Format? A. -- Adam Twardoch | Language Typography Unicode Fonts OpenType | twardoch.com | silesian.com | fontlab.net The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer. (Henry Kissinger)
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 17:20:38 UTC