- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:27:47 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:03:08 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> It was rejected because the behavior of using ellipsis on every >> horizontally overflowing line in a case that also has vertical >> overflow has valid use cases. E.g. a text editor may choose to >> indicate which lines overflow the viewport in the horizontal >> direction, and not give any special indication of overflow in >> the vertical direction. >> >> There seemed to be agreement if an indicator of vertical overflow >> was needed, a separate property would be required. It was also >> noted that this would be useful on paged media. >> >> It appears none of this was minuted, however. :/ > > And what was the reason again this could not be dependent on the > values of overflow-x and overflow-y? For the text editor case you > could e.g. have overflow-x:hidden;overflow-y:auto. I'd still want to be able to scroll to see the hidden content? ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 13:28:40 UTC