- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I wasn't sure if the spec was yet in a sufficiently advanced state to raise spelling issues, but given today's discussion I'll send this email which has been lying around for a while, which raises the "descendant" vs "descendent" issue that David Baron looks to have at least partly addressed. Perhaps the source references are of use. I just wanted to raise a quick editorial issue: the words "descendent" and "descendant" are used throughout the spec, both as adjectives and nouns. Whilst both are acceptable in both roles according to Merriam Webster, I think the spec should opt for one spelling per role and use it consistently. Note that Merriam Webster prefers the '-ant' form in both roles, while the Oxford English Dictionary is having none of the '-ent' form at all! Also, in 17.5.2 (Table width algorithms: the 'table-layout' property): # However, once the calculated value of 'width' for the table is # found (using the algorithms given below or, when appropriate, some # other UA dependant algorithm) then the other parts of section 10.3 # do apply. s/UA dependant/UA-dependent/ Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 16:06:05 UTC