- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:55:02 +0100
- To: W3C Emailing list for WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 7/6/09 00:46, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > I've got a few other, more minor questions about GSM 03.30 and CSS: [snip] > Given GSM 03.30 doesn't have a name in the IANA > registry, why doesn't this mean that "as specified, transcoded from GSM > 03.38 to ASCII" is a condition that could never be met, since a > specification like "GSM0338" or "GSM03.38" would violate this MUST > requirement and have to be discarded? [snip] > 2. I've noticed that Unicode deliberately redefined the meaning of GSM > 03.30 hex 09 from uppercase to lowercase c cedilla. [snip] > 3. Does anyone have any examples of CSS encoded as GSM 03.30 Gargh. Apologies for the confusing typo here: please substitute "03.38" for "03.30" throughout. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Saturday, 6 June 2009 23:55:42 UTC