- From: Ludger Buenger <ludger.buenger@realobjects.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:07:15 +0200
- To: "W3C style mailing list" <www-style@w3.org>
David Perrell wrote: > > I don't understand why the CSS spec should be concerned with > CMYK. I'd like to point out that we currently discuss something defined in the gcpm module which has the specific purpose to define CSS extensions used for paper-based publishing. I cite from the CSS3 gcpm module introduction: "This specification describes various functionality which is commonly used in paper-based publishing. Some of the proposed functionality (e.g., hyphenation and the new list style types) may also used with other media types. However, this specification is only concerned with the 'print' media type." So the ability to use colors defined in CMYK is targeted specifically to applications providing CSS driven paper-based publishing using the print media type. >From my understanding even browsers -while supporting the 'print' media when printing- are unlikely to be used in "paper based publishing" and thus have no need to support this module. So we are not talking about "CSS spec in general" being concerned with CMYK but only about the gcpm module. Chris Murphy wrote: > Using that logic, CSS3 should support YCbCr because that is a required color space for JFIF/JPEG files. I you find supporters to introduce a CSS module specifying CSS for applications rendering to JFIF/JPEG, that might be an option for said CSS module. You might decide yourself whether you have need for such a module.
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 09:07:51 UTC