- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:49:14 -0700
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 28, 2009, at 1:01 PM, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote: >> I wonder if "bounding-box" can be a value for "background-clip", >> where it would act the same as "border-box", except in cases >> involving broken boxes and "box-break: each-box"? I haven't put a >> lot of thought into this idea yet, but it seems like it would work, >> be simpler than the current draft, and satisfy most or all use cases. > > Or something like: > > background-attachment: relative(<ancestor-id>); > > Yet another idea would be to have a property that established what > object fixed positioned backgrounds inside the container are fixed to: > > background-fixed-container: viewport | self Not bad. So then 'self' would become the context for background:fixed of any of it's children, except for children that set their own background-fixed-container values? A couple more values would be nice: background-fixed-container: viewport | self | parent | block- formatting-context
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 20:50:04 UTC