Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:25:58AM -0700, Brad Kemper wrote:
>
> On May 29, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
>> 3) If a box T is not a 'table-column' box and has a parent P which is a
>>   'table-column-group' box, discard T.
>
> Does it go without saying that if the display of parent P ever changed  
> to, say, a table-body box or table-row box (via JavaScript, for  
> instance), that you may need to re-insert T? Or that if T changed its  
> display to 'table-column', that it should be re-inserted?

One thing that may be relevant is that one can't directly change the display
value of P (which is a box, and not accessible from ecmascript), one can only
change display values of elements.

pjrm.

Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 21:56:03 UTC