- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:45:08 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2009 20:46:01 UTC
Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2009, at 12:47 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Zack > Weinberg<zweinberg@mozilla.com> wrote: >> When the "border styles" are suppressed due to the presence of a >> border >> image, should browsers continue to clip the background to the >> specified >> border-radius? Empirically, both Firefox (3.5 and trunk) and Webkit >> (1.1.10) do so, but I doubt anyone really thought about it. I could >> argue both ways on whether it's desirable -- the attached example >> looks >> bad, but I could come up with a border image for which it would look >> good. > > Brad Kemper had an test page covering this: > http://www.bradclicks.com/cssplay/BorderImageAndRadius.html > > It seems that allowing border-radius to continue to work (at least for > clipping backgrounds) in the presence of border-image can be useful. > > ~TJ Yes, especially if it used the inner curve to clip the background in the presence of background-clip:padding-box; >
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2009 20:46:01 UTC