Names of CSS specifications

It seems we are not that consistent in naming our specifications. Do we  
care about fixing this? http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work.html is  
also not consistent with specifications.

E.g.

   CSS3 Module: Fonts
   CSS Color Module Level 3
   CSS Text Level 3
   CSS Namespaces Module
   CSS3 Basic User Interface Module

are all different in style.

Now it might be that http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work.html  
suggests consistent names for these in the table fantasai made though even  
there I find CSSOM View Module where none of the other names have Module  
in them.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 12:47:56 UTC