- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:47:12 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
It seems we are not that consistent in naming our specifications. Do we care about fixing this? http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work.html is also not consistent with specifications. E.g. CSS3 Module: Fonts CSS Color Module Level 3 CSS Text Level 3 CSS Namespaces Module CSS3 Basic User Interface Module are all different in style. Now it might be that http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work.html suggests consistent names for these in the table fantasai made though even there I find CSSOM View Module where none of the other names have Module in them. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 12:47:56 UTC