- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:53:19 -0600
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, www-style@w3.org, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
I would also expect to see a transition here. On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: >> Just to make sure we are all thinking the same thing. In the >> following >> example: >> >> transition-property: border; >> transition-duration: 1s; >> >> If I now apply a style rule "border-top-width: 2px", do you expect >> to see a >> transition? > > I would expect to see a transition. > > An alternate reasonable proposal would be that I would *not* see a > transition, as only changes made explicitly to the "border" property > will trigger. This requires the author to be more explicit, but would > at least be sensible. I don't see any particular reason to do this > over the general "yes, you'll see a transition" proposal, though, and > since the "yes" answer is much simpler for authors, I prefer it. > > The proposal that I am completely against is the one where shorthand > properties are automatically expanded in the transition-property list, > and then matched against the (unchanged) transition-duration list. > (In particular, would that make *any* sense in the case of plain > 'border'? Is there a canonical ordering of the non-shorthand > properties that make it up?) > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 19:54:02 UTC