- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:21:49 -0800
- To: Brad Kemper <brkemper.comcast@gmail.com>
- CC: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > > > I always thought it would make the most sense to treat the marker as > though it was position:absolute within (and relative to) the LI, with a > negative LEFT value and auto TOP and BOTTOM. In that case, it would not > affect the line-height, would not take up space, would not be affected > by the horizontal scroll position (but would be affected by the vertical > scroll position). I was thinking that it would be visible outside the > scrollbox of the UL or OL, but it looks like not: even though it is out > of the flow, it is still clipped by its overflow container, even when > overflow-x is supposed to be visible. > I've posted some samples of what I mean here: > > http://bradclicks.com/cssplay/scrolling%20lists.html The discussion isn't about setting overflow on <ol>, but rather of setting overflow on <li>. <ol> isn't special in CSS, it's just another block. <li> elements, however, are display: list-item. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 02:22:31 UTC