- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:45:24 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2009-01-13 14:03 -0800, fantasai wrote: >>> By the way, neither WebKit or FireFox (Minefield) are currently doing >>> any clipping of the foreground when 'overfow' is hidden, as this text >>> says it should. I agree that they should do so, and maybe that just >>> hasn't yet been implemented but will be. >> Yeah, those should be considered bugs. > > Should they? > > I'm really not sure how this should look when 'overflow' is 'scroll' > or 'auto', and up to now, 'scroll', 'auto', and 'hidden' work in > reasonably similar ways. Yes, we really want to be able to clip image content to the curve of the border-radius. As for scrollbars, I've added this to the spec: # The UA may reduce or treat as zero the border-radius for a # given corner if a scrolling mechanism is present in that corner. So I expect that in a UA whose scrollbars require a sharp corner, when the scrollbars are present the border-radius is reduced such that the padding edge's radius is zero. Drawing the curved corner over or under the scrollbars would look ridiculous, imo. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 22:46:07 UTC