- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:53:32 +0100
- To: "Keith Rarick" <kr@xph.us>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Keith Rarick:
> I'm interested in implementing the CSS3 root em unit in Mozilla
Great!
> (in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472195), but David
> Baron has suggested that it might not be ready to implement, given
> that it was recently renamed from "rem" to "re" in the current
> editor's draft.
True, I've changed this in:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/
I'm still working on this draft -- adding gr and fr units and such.
The draft will be announced on this list when it's ready for review.
I will propose to change "rem" to "re" because:
- all other length units are two-letter, it seems logical to follow
this scheme unless there's a good reason not to
- "rem" reminds me of the the old basic "remark" command. This is
not a very good reason, just something that pops up in my head
whenever I see it. I'm sure "re" will remind some people of email
messages.
What do people think -- should it be changed back?
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 08:54:14 UTC