- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:53:32 +0100
- To: "Keith Rarick" <kr@xph.us>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Keith Rarick: > I'm interested in implementing the CSS3 root em unit in Mozilla Great! > (in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472195), but David > Baron has suggested that it might not be ready to implement, given > that it was recently renamed from "rem" to "re" in the current > editor's draft. True, I've changed this in: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/ I'm still working on this draft -- adding gr and fr units and such. The draft will be announced on this list when it's ready for review. I will propose to change "rem" to "re" because: - all other length units are two-letter, it seems logical to follow this scheme unless there's a good reason not to - "rem" reminds me of the the old basic "remark" command. This is not a very good reason, just something that pops up in my head whenever I see it. I'm sure "re" will remind some people of email messages. What do people think -- should it be changed back? -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 08:54:14 UTC