- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:48:23 +0100
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: Adam Twardoch <list.adam@twardoch.com>, Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>, www-style@w3.org
Philip TAYLOR wrote: > 2) Allow an optional LINK/REL record in both HTML and > CSS which specifies the URL of a language file containing > a sequence of ordered pairs; each ordered pair contains > the canonical name (in <Am.E> )and the equivalent name in > the user's preferred language. > > If this idea were to be seriously considered, one could > envisage that the W3C would create and host a number of such > language files, one for each of the major languages in > use on the web today. Will never happen. For many excellent reasons. But an important one is the following : if your l10n file can't be loaded, you're stuck with html and css instances your browser just cannot parse. Oops. Let's go back to reality, please. </Daniel> -- W3C CSS WG, Co-chair
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 16:49:06 UTC