- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:22:24 -0800
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, www-international@w3.org, HÃ¥kon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > > fantasai 2009-02-13 20.32: > >> alpha("a-z") >> alpha("a-f,q-z") >> alpha("do,re,mi,fa,so,la,ti") > > Do you use 'alpha' for "latin alphabet"? Or could alpha be used for > Cyrillic as well? alpha() is simply functional notation. What characters you put in its argument is unrelated to its name. I chose alpha() rather than something else because it is alphabetic systems that we are discussing here. See http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-lists/#numeric > If you are taking your pattern from the way RegEx/GREP > is working, then remember that e.g. \p{Armenian} matches any character > in the Armenian block.[1] > > Hence e.g. > alpha(armenian) > could also be useful. For a lot of languages this might wind up matching various bits of punctuation and other characters that aren't quite letters. > Btw, why did you pick "alpha"? Why not "numb"? Or do you think that e.g. > pure symbols should be excluded or have another name? If we needed numeric(), it would treat the first character as a zero value. I'm happy to just add keywords for the numeric systems, however. There are vastly fewer permutations of them. Afaict, given the way they've encoded Persian separate from Arabic-Indic, none in fact. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 23:23:16 UTC