On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> > wrote: > > So one question just came to mind: how do we deal with box-shadow > "spread" > > if we're using the border-images to generate a non-rectangular mask? I > don't > > see any reasonable option. > > I can't think of anything that wouldn't be computationally ridiculous. > Would it be horrible to just ignore it? > You mean ignore "spread" if border-images are present? Slightly unclean, but perhaps the best option. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 22:45:32 UTC