- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:44:03 +0200
- To: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org, W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
On Feb 10, 2009, at 12:47, Robert J Burns wrote: > I originally like the statement of the problem Henri composed and > added to the wiki page. However, the latest edits that remove L. > David Baron's problem statement actually make the piece almost > impossible to follow. I know what its supposed to say and I have > trouble following it, so I think an uninitiated reader will not have > a clue what the issue is about. I didn't remove the original problem statement. I *moved* it to the *linked* page that approaches the issue from the Unicode technical background point of view as opposed from the point of view of what authors should be able to do. I've added a concrete Vietnamese example and noted that the other case needs a concrete example. I also added a quick explanation of normalization forms using the Vietnamese letter as an example. (It seems that the Vietnamese input mode on Mac OS X normalizes to NFC, by the way. In fact, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Mac OS X already had solution #1 covered and this was just an issue of other systems catching up.) > Even before these latest changes the page needed more clarification > added. For example, some of the solutions are difficult to > differentiate: for example number #1 and #4 (originally #3). What's difficult to differentiate between #1 and #4? Solution #1 is requiring input methods to normalize. Solution #4 is creating a new encoding name utf-8-nfc for allowing authors to opt in to consumer- side normalization on the encoding decoder layer. > In any event the latest changes have made the page seem completely > unconnected to the discussions on the list serve. I gathered that the point of moving to the wiki was not to avoid bringing it all to the list serve. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 12:44:46 UTC