- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:48:56 -0500 (EST)
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- cc: www-style@w3.org, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>> Shouldn't selector use a production capturing those requirements,
>>> (something along the line of HASHIDENT = '#' IDENT) instead of HASH?
>>
>> The grammar in general is a lot more lax than what CSS2.1 requires.
>> Bert will have to give you the long explanation, syntax isn't my
>> specialty. :)
Another thing, in the grammar, CLASS is defined as "." IDENT, so
constructs like ".55ft" are not recognized as a class, and the last bullet
in [1] can never occur. So should CLASS be "." NAME ?
Cheers,
[1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/grammar.html#tokenizer-diffs>
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 10:49:06 UTC