- From: Andrey Mikhalev <amikhal@abisoft.spb.ru>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:30:56 +0300 (MSK)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:55:18 +0100, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: >> On Wednesday 2009-02-04 13:43 -0800, Peter Linss wrote: >>> Agreed. Perhaps the text should read: "after any well-formed statement", >>> or simply "after any statement". >> >> I'm a little uncomfortable with ignoring @import after an unknown >> @-rule. That would mean we couldn't extend CSS with new @-rules >> that belong before @import. (For example, an @base rule to set the >> base URL, like html:base or xml:base.) > > I think it does not really matter either way. Introducing e.g @base would > break things regardless. In fact, if the @import is not dropped it might very > well lead to a bunch of 404s in legacy clients. > hmm... what about introducing http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/specs/constants/ ? > >
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:31:40 UTC