- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:45:00 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:55:18 +0100, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 2009-02-04 13:43 -0800, Peter Linss wrote: >> Agreed. Perhaps the text should read: "after any well-formed statement", >> or simply "after any statement". > > I'm a little uncomfortable with ignoring @import after an unknown > @-rule. That would mean we couldn't extend CSS with new @-rules > that belong before @import. (For example, an @base rule to set the > base URL, like html:base or xml:base.) I think it does not really matter either way. Introducing e.g @base would break things regardless. In fact, if the @import is not dropped it might very well lead to a bunch of 404s in legacy clients. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 09:45:46 UTC