- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:51:19 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-i18n-core@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Per the grammar you should be able to get a non-normalized tree and > should not suddenly end up with, say, a tree normalized to NFC. It does > not explicitly forbid it, but it does not forbid throwing a non > namespace well-formedness error on Sundays either. OK. So in other words a parser that normalizes as it goes would not technically be XML 1.0 compliant, yes? -Boris
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 14:52:20 UTC