- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:50:56 +0100
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:13:07 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > One question I have is whether this issue would be resolved if a UA > performed parse-time normalization on everything (JS, CSS, XML, HTML). > That wouldn't completely help JS because you can build up strings > codepoint-by-codepoint but that also lets you create invalid UTF-16 > strings, so I'm not sure it's worth worrying about right now. HTML & XML character references and CSS character escapes would also allow for the same character to be represented in different forms as far as I can tell. (Though not quite as extreme as in JS, still basically the same "issue".) Leaving that alone and only doing this parse-time seems fine though. However, in my opinion it has not really been justified that it is necessary in the first place. (And then there's the bits Martin pointed out.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 11:52:05 UTC