- From: Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:33:09 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: "site-comments@w3.org" <site-comments@w3.org>
Since I got quoted for great justice, I thought I'd pop in and
contribute a few words to the thread.
At 4:48 PM +1100 12/1/09, Peter Moulder wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:19:05PM -0600, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>
>> I note that Eric Meyer does not choose sides in the author/user battle:
>> http://webstandardsgroup.org/features/eric-meyer.cfm
I should point out that the referenced interview is over five
years old. To be slightly more current, here's a piece from only 3.5
years ago:
http://thinkvitamin.com/features/making-popular-layout-decisions/
>Unfortunately, he doesn't go into what the drawbacks of non-px
>font-sizes are, but at least it's evidence that an acknowledged expert
>thought that there were some drawbacks back in 2004.
Even earlier than that, actually. I've thought there are
drawbacks to both absolute-unit font sizing and relative-unit font
sizing ever since 1997 or so. How I see this particular issue is
largely summarized in the more recent piece I linked above.
I will also note that both the interview and the article were
written in a time before page zoom (as opposed to text zoom), so I
might have a different angle if I wrote a similar piece today.
Nevertheless, I think I probably hold to the following lines just as
much today as I did in the past:
"Any time a person tells you that there is one and only one way to
size fonts for all sites, they're trying to hand you a philosophy,
not a solution." (WSG interview)
"Here's my point: you can never satisfy everyone with your choices
of Web design techniques. It is simply not possible." (ThinkVitamin
article)
--
Eric A. Meyer (eric@meyerweb.com) http://meyerweb.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 15:38:15 UTC