Re: [css3-transitions] rule for animation of 'visibility' is backwards

On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:50 PM, L. David Baron wrote:

> On Monday 2009-11-30 14:15 -0600, David Hyatt wrote:
>> This is definitely just a mistake in the spec.
> 
> Does the following text make sense instead:
> # visibility: interpolated via a discrete step.  Animations
> # between 'visible' and 'hidden' are interpolated so that all
> # intermediate values are 'visible'.  Animations involving 
> # 'collapse' cannot be interpolated.
> 
> Is that a reasonable way to handle 'collapse'?  Or is there a better
> option?

The way that WebKit implements this is to treat all intermediate values
between anything and 'visible' as 'visible'.  So I'm not sure that you
need to call out 'collapse'.

Simon

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 03:28:27 UTC