- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:50:25 -0800
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Monday 2009-11-30 14:15 -0600, David Hyatt wrote: > This is definitely just a mistake in the spec. Does the following text make sense instead: # visibility: interpolated via a discrete step. Animations # between 'visible' and 'hidden' are interpolated so that all # intermediate values are 'visible'. Animations involving # 'collapse' cannot be interpolated. Is that a reasonable way to handle 'collapse'? Or is there a better option? -David > On Nov 28, 2009, at 12:06 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#animation-of-property-types- > >says: > > # visibility: interpolated via a discrete step. The interpolation > > # happens in real number space between 0 and 1, where 1 is > > # "visible" and all other values are "hidden". > > > >Based on > >http://dbaron.org/css/test/2009/transitions/transition-visibility it > >appears that what WebKit implements is that values between 0 and 1 > >are treated as 'visibile', which makes more sense to me. (For > >example, it means that you can animate 'opacity' and 'visibility' on > >the same function and end up with an element that ignores mouse > >events only when 'opacity' is '0'.) > > > >(Though see my previous message for other comments on this: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0328.html ) -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:51:00 UTC