- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:04:31 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
fantasai wrote: > fantasai: We probably want approval from bz and/or dbaron before going > anywhere with this... For what it's worth, I plan to respond to the proposal mail in the next day or two. I need to read it carefully and think about it a bit first... > fantasai: Tab's point that run-ins should run into each other is good In which situation? Are we talking about a run-in running into a block run-in, or a run-in running into a run-in that also runs in? The latter is pretty different from the way run-in is "supposed" to work, it seems to me, since it has a run-in running into an inline that's a child of its following block.... > bradk: any downside ? Might be hard to define the "right" behavior (and then hard to implement it, depending on what ends up being defined). > * anne thinks run-in is a bit weird anyway Amen. ;) > fantasai: another solution is to add another display type > howcome: run-run-in ? That's really no better than changing the behavior of run-in, I suspect... I doubt the case(s) we're discussing appear on the web much. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 22:05:25 UTC