- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:01:48 -0700
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, W3C Emailing list for WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com> wrote: > Slightly dashed and slightly dotted sounds like "slightly pregnant" > for me. > Or does CSS allow such state? If "yes" then how. If "no" then also > how. We cannot just be silent about it. Sure we can. It's perfectly fine for the rendering of style transitions around curved corners to be unspecified in Level 3. > If it is undefined then we need to say so clearly and to provide any > reasonable fall-back. I personally do not see any other options > other than treating corner curves as having solid color always. > But that's me, AFAIR someone here said that they have a solution and > current rendering in Mozilla is just a bug. So asking. That was me. To be clear, when I said "current rendering in Mozilla is just a bug" I was thinking first of this case: border-style: dotted; border-radius: <nonzero> where the dots obviously should continue around the corner curve. Mozilla currently draws that with solid corners, and that's a bug. (Specifically, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382721 .) Mozilla has no current plans to implement anything but sharp transitions in the middle of the corner. I would argue that that is clearly preferable to "always draw the corner as solid", no matter what the adjoining styles are. For the specific case of dotted transitioning to dashed I do not see what would be wrong with having the dots stretch into dashes along the curve; the pregnancy analogy makes no sense. zw
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 22:02:32 UTC