- From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:52:21 +0200
- To: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Zack Weinberg<zweinberg@mozilla.com> wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> wrote: >> One thing that _could_ be done would be extend the url() syntax to be >> >> url(<uri> [<mimetype>] [,<uri> [<mimetype>]*) > > No changes to url() whatsoever, please. Yep, I wouldn't like it either. >> <uri> is either an url() function or an argumento to url() [i.e., >> url() is optional] > > Don't do this either. > > [ the URI token is very special, and its specialness should not infect > any more of the grammar ] Well, it's in the proposed draft for image(), so I thought it could be taken to a more generalized form ... -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:53:28 UTC