- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:01:41 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Sent from my iPhone On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:41 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > No it's... no it's not. I have no idea how you got this impression, > Brad. In that particular argument you, I, and ROC were all talking > about the function vs property angle, not the functional-colorstops vs > simpler-colorstops. It may have been what he was talking about. It wasn't what I was talking about. I was talking about reducing the complexity of all the values down to three for most common cases, and getting rid of all those different functional notations in the values, and combining radial and linear into the same set of values instead of two. I was proposing a sytax that worked equally well for values of a separate property or for an image. I was never advocating a property instead of a image function.
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 02:02:28 UTC