W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Viewport scrolling to reach overflow from root element [Was: Re: ?Shadows vs. layout]

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:35:11 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0908040835w3f202686x94c30c589f80ef39@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Anton Prowse<prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote:
> @Tab: sorry, I didn't receive your message until after sending my
> previous one.

No problem.

> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> I don't know whether or not it's still relevant (I've stopped doing
>> it, myself, in favor of practices that more directly lean on
>> accessibility features)
> (Care to expand on these practices?)

If at all possible, I use purely decorative background images combined
with styled and positioned real text.  That's the absolute best
situation, and it'll get easier as we get font format interop in
@font-face.  It's surprising how often I can do this, though - for the
most part you want readable text in your buttons, and that means
fairly traditional fonts, which I can generally rely on being

When I can't do that, I use <img alt>.  This means that I'm basically
embedding presentational information (the location of the image) in
the HTML, but it's easy and guaranteed accessible to *anyone*.  The
upkeep problems are minimized in my case as I use this technique
mainly only in the overall site template - I've trained Advertising to
keep things a little simpler in the content area of their designs.

> However, as far as text-indent being poisoned goes, when used without
> overflow:hidden it's no different from any other technique which relies
> on off-screen clipping, including simple negative margins etc, any of
> which could theoretically be being used to address more or less the same
> issue.  The thing that's poisoned is off-screen clipping itself; alas
> it's certainly not realistic to change this curious behaviour now.

Oh, indeed.  I was just bringing up something relevant to the
conversation that not everyone may have remembered.

Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:36:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:38 UTC