- From: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:33:38 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
We started from the proposal for tabbed interfaces that was in Advanced Layout (before it was renamed to Template Layout). Slowly it developed into a proposal for Advanced User Interface Module and, basically, the ability to "check" any element by clicking in it (or pressing return while focused). That "checking" should set the :checked pseudo-class and remove any :checked pseudo-class on element that belong to the same "radio-group" / "toggle-group" (set by the appropriate property). I initially argued for "binding", later for "user-select", to avoid the over-generalization of this behavior. 2009/4/24 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>: > Brad Kemper wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Giovanni Campagna > I don't >> understand your point. First you say you "don't support your >> > ":checked" on any element ". Then you say "UAs should anyway keep >> track of >> > :checked for every element", which seems to be the opposite point >> of view. >> >> Actually, the first sentence is the result of the second: "I don't >> support your proposal because the UA would have to keep track etc." >> >> I see. I wouldn't think that would be burdensome on the UA, but perhaps an >> implementer can chime in about that. > > I have to admit I've been mostly mass-deleting this thread. What's the > context here? What proposal are we discussing? > > -Boris > >
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 19:34:21 UTC