Brad Kemper wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Giovanni Campagna > > I don't understand your point. First you say you "don't support your > > ":checked" on any element ". Then you say "UAs should anyway keep > track of > > :checked for every element", which seems to be the opposite point > of view. > > Actually, the first sentence is the result of the second: "I don't > support your proposal because the UA would have to keep track etc." > > I see. I wouldn't think that would be burdensome on the UA, but perhaps > an implementer can chime in about that. I have to admit I've been mostly mass-deleting this thread. What's the context here? What proposal are we discussing? -BorisReceived on Friday, 24 April 2009 19:26:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:35 UTC