- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:13:46 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > > I agree. Similarly, if you have a background that is supposed to align > with the top, bottom, or middle of the box, then it seems likely that > you would want it to break in the same fashion as border-break. That is, > if there are two border-tops and two border-bottoms for each element > because of a page break, then the backgrounds should similarly be > repeated on both pages. But if the border breaking policy is to treat it > as one box that's been sliced in two, then it should work the same way > for backgrounds. > > It does seem to me that border-break and background-break should be the > same property. Thus, if border-break is "none", then background-break > should be "each box", otherwise should be "continuous". Then again, I > don't really understand the difference between "continuous" and > "bounding-box" (I don't think it is explained very clearly). > Is "bounding-box" really needed, or just for edge cases, or should it > replace "continuous"? It seems like it is trying to do something special > when there are varying page widths, but it is something nothing else > about the box does. bounding-box vs. continuous becomes particularly relevant in multicol elements. Imagine my background image is a stretchable gradient : : : : ::: continuous for an element broken across 2 columns looks like +---------+ +---------+ | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| +---------+ +---------+ That is, the background is rendered as if the boxes were pieces of +---------+ | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| | : : :::| +---------+ bounding-box looks like +---------+ +---------+ | : : ::::| | : :| | : : ::::| | : :| | : : ::::| | : :| +---------+ +---------+ That is, the background is rendered as if the boxes are cut out of +---------------------+ | : : : : : ::::| | : : : : : ::::| | : : : : : ::::| | : : : : : ::::| +---------------------+ ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 19:14:24 UTC