- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:02:50 +0100
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Sylvain Galineau wrote: > Yes to the naming consistency. But wouldn't the author still want to combine some of these 'flags' together e.g. > > page-break-inside: avoid-column, avoid-page; > > Such multivalue expressions would of course not be backward compatible but the other options currently on the table are not either afaik. I like the idea, but not the name : "page-break-inside" should restrict its domain to pages, as its name implies; "break-inside" could take values such as "avoid-column" and "avoid-page" without introducing a conflict between attribute name and allowed values. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 08:03:33 UTC