- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 03:06:28 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: (wrong string) åkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Tab Atkins Jr.:
> > So I support the following:
> >
> > page-break-before, page-break-after
> > Value: auto | always | avoid | left | right | column | allow-column | avoid-turn
> >
> > page-break-inside
> > Value: auto | avoid | allow-column | avoid-turn
...
> I would prefer we unify whether we phrase the values as allow-* or
> avoid-*. This would that, for page-break-inside, we'd either have
> "auto | avoid-page | avoid-turn | avoid-column" (in ascending order of
> strictness) or "auto | allow-column | allow-facing | allow-none". I
> prefer the former, as phrasing it in terms of avoiding page breaks
> seems more natural.
And, what would we have for page-break-inside?
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 01:07:35 UTC