- From: Grant, Melinda <melinda.grant@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:17:17 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
TJ said: > I would prefer we unify whether we phrase the values as > allow-* or avoid-*. Agreed. > This would that, for page-break-inside, > we'd either have "auto | avoid-page | avoid-turn | > avoid-column" (in ascending order of > strictness) You lost me on the increasing order of strictness. In what way would 'avoid-column' be "more strict" than 'avoid-turn'? And in what way would 'avoid-turn' be "more strict" than 'avoid-page'? Or are you just referring to the fact that, for a given amount of content, restricting it to a column is less likely to succeed than restricting it to a pair of facing pages? But then I would expect your ordered list to be "auto | avoid-turn | avoid-page | avoid-colunm"...? If you're suggesting there should be an inherent weighting of the values (that is, that the UA should somehow 'try harder' to satisfy one than the other), could you elaborate a bit further? Best wishes, Melinda
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 02:18:24 UTC